Systematic review and meta-analysis of long term outcomes and innovations in Total Knee Arthroplasty: KINEMATIC, PERSONALIZED KNEE vs. CONVENTIONAL
Zaki Suliman Alhifzi
Abstract
Background Kinematic alignment is an emerging approach for total knee arthroplasty, with the aim to restore patient’s individual pre-arthritic joint kinematics. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the kinematic alignment with the conventional mechanical alignment for total knee arthroplasty. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus on June 2, 2024. We screened the retrieved studies for eligibility. Then extracted the data from the included studies, and then pooled the data as mean difference (MD) or odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval using Review Manager Software (ver. 3.5). Results There was no significant difference between KA and MA in the different reported scores: combined KSS score at 6 months ( P = 0.23) and 1 years ( P = 0.60), KSS Patient satisfaction ( P = 0.33), KSS function score ( P = 0.07), Oxford score at 6 months ( P = 0.45) and 2 years ( P = 0.41), KOOS score ( P = 0.26). Moreover, there was statistically significant difference in range of motion for flexion and extension at 1 and 2 years, incision length, the length of hospital stay, or the duration of surgery. Conclusion Although kinematic alignment showed slightly better clinical outcomes than mechanical alignment, the difference between the two techniques is not statistically significant.