Marmoset and human trophoblast stem cells differ in signaling requirements and recapitulate divergent modes of trophoblast invasion
Dylan Siriwardena, Clara Munger, Christopher A. Penfold, Timo N. Kohler, Antonia Weberling, Madeleine Linneberg-Agerholm, Erin Slatery, Anna L. Ellermann, Sophie Bergmann, Stephen J. Clark, Thomas M. Rawlings, Joshua M. Brickman, Wolf Reik, Jan J. Brosens, Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz, Erika Sasaki, Rüdiger Behr, Florian Hollfelder, Thorsten Boroviak
Abstract
Early human trophoblast development has remained elusive due to the inaccessibility of the early conceptus. Non-human primate models recapitulate many features of human development and allow access to early postimplantation stages. Here, we tracked the pre- to postimplantation transition of the trophoblast lineage in superficially implanting marmoset embryos in vivo. We differentiated marmoset naive pluripotent stem cells into trophoblast stem cells (TSCs), which exhibited trophoblast-specific transcriptome, methylome, differentiation potential, and long-term self-renewal. Notably, human TSC culture conditions failed to support marmoset TSC derivation, instead inducing an extraembryonic mesoderm-like fate in marmoset cells. We show that combined MEK, TGF-β/NODAL, and histone deacetylase inhibition stabilizes a periimplantation trophoblast-like identity in marmoset TSCs. By contrast, these conditions differentiated human TSCs toward extravillous trophoblasts. Our work presents a paradigm to harness the evolutionary divergence in implantation strategies to elucidate human trophoblast development and invasion.