Litcius/Paper detail

Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Computer-Assisted Navigation—2-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Randomized Study

Richard Lass, Boris Olischar, Bernd Kubista, Thomas Waldhoer, Alexander Giurea, Reinhard Windhager

2020Journal of Clinical Medicine27 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare computer-assisted to manual implantation-techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to find out if the computer-assisted surgery is able to improve the clinical and functional results and reduce the dislocation rate in short-terms after THA. We performed a concise minimum 2-year follow-up of the patient cohort of a prospective randomized study published in 2014 and evaluated if the higher implantation accuracy in the navigated group can be seen as an important determinant of success in total hip arthroplasty. Although a significant difference was found in mean postoperative acetabular component anteversion and in the outliers regarding inclination and anteversion (p < 0.05) between the computer-assisted and the manual-placed group, we could not find significant differences regarding clinical outcome or revision rates at 2-years follow-up. The implantation accuracy in the navigated group can be regarded as an important determinant of success in THA, although no significant differences in clinical outcome could be detected at short-term follow-up. Therefore, further long-term follow-up of our patient group is needed.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineTotal hip arthroplastyRandomized controlled trialArthroplastyProspective cohort studyHip arthroplastyPhysical therapySurgeryOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyTotal Knee Arthroplasty OutcomesOrthopedic Infections and Treatments