Litcius/Paper detail

Evaluation of the Hierarchical Correspondence between the Human Brain and Artificial Neural Networks: A Review

Trung Quang Pham, Teppei Matsui, Junichi Chikazoe

2023Biology12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) that are heavily inspired by the human brain now achieve human-level performance across multiple task domains. ANNs have thus drawn attention in neuroscience, raising the possibility of providing a framework for understanding the information encoded in the human brain. However, the correspondence between ANNs and the brain cannot be measured directly. They differ in outputs and substrates, neurons vastly outnumber their ANN analogs (i.e., nodes), and the key algorithm responsible for most of modern ANN training (i.e., backpropagation) is likely absent from the brain. Neuroscientists have thus taken a variety of approaches to examine the similarity between the brain and ANNs at multiple levels of their information hierarchy. This review provides an overview of the currently available approaches and their limitations for evaluating brain-ANN correspondence.

Topics & Concepts

Artificial neural networkHierarchyHuman brainArtificial intelligenceVariety (cybernetics)BiologySimilarity (geometry)Machine learningTask (project management)NeuroscienceComputer scienceCognitive sciencePsychologyManagementMarket economyEconomicsImage (mathematics)Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural dynamics and brain function
Evaluation of the Hierarchical Correspondence between the Human Brain and Artificial Neural Networks: A Review | Litcius