Litcius/Paper detail

The biosecurity benefits of genetic engineering attribution

Gregory W. Lewis, Jacob L. Jordan, David A. Relman, Gregory D. Koblentz, Jade Leung, Allan Dafoe, Cassidy Nelson, Gerald L. Epstein, Rebecca Katz, Michael Montague, Ethan C. Alley, Claire Marie Filone, Stephen P. Luby, George M. Church, Piers Millett, Kevin M. Esvelt, Elizabeth E. Cameron, Thomas V. Inglesby

2020Nature Communications51 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Biology can be misused, and the risk of this causing widespread harm increases in step with the rapid march of technological progress. A key security challenge involves attribution: determining, in the wake of a human-caused biological event, who was responsible. Recent scientific developments have demonstrated a capability for detecting whether an organism involved in such an event has been genetically modified and, if modified, to infer from its genetic sequence its likely lab of origin. We believe this technique could be developed into powerful forensic tools to aid the attribution of outbreaks caused by genetically engineered pathogens, and thus protect against the potential misuse of synthetic biology.

Topics & Concepts

BiosecurityAttributionHarmOrganismEvent (particle physics)Risk analysis (engineering)Biological warfareBiologyComputational biologyComputer scienceBiotechnologyData scienceBusinessGeneticsPolitical sciencePsychologyEcologyToxicologyQuantum mechanicsPhysicsSocial psychologyLawBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchLaw, AI, and Intellectual PropertyCell Image Analysis Techniques