Factors affecting the critical appraisal of research articles in <scp>Evidence‐Based</scp> practices by advanced practice nurses: A descriptive qualitative study
Ai Tomotaki, Ikuko Sakai, Hiroki Fukahori, Yasunobu Tsuda, Akemi Okumura‐Hiroshige
Abstract
AIM: To describe factors affecting critical appraisal of research articles in evidence-based practice by certified nurse specialists who were advanced practice nurses in Japan. DESIGN: A descriptive qualitative study. METHODS: Fourteen certified nurse specialists with master's degree were included by a snowball sampling to maximize the variety of specialty fields for advanced practice nurses in Japan. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between November 2016 and March 2017. Interview guides included the experience of evidence-based practice and learning about critical appraisal. RESULTS: The following four aspects were identified as factors affecting the critical appraisal of research articles in evidence-based practices-individual beliefs and attitude, learning status, organizational readiness and availability of research evidence. Each factor included both positive and negative aspects for critical appraisal in evidence-based practice. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: If advanced practice nurses acquire knowledge/skills of critical appraisal, they would be able to select more appropriate care. This will increase to improve the health-related outcome for patients or populations.