Litcius/Paper detail

Post‐Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians

Margaret Samuels‐Kalow, Pooja Agrawal, Giovanni Rodriguez, Amy Zeidan, Jennifer S. Love, Derek L. Monette, Michelle Lin, Richelle J. Cooper, Tracy E. Madsen, Valerie Dobiesz

2022Academic Emergency Medicine30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade, removing almost 50 years of precedent and enabling the imposition of a wide range of state-level restrictions on abortion access. Historical data from the United States and internationally demonstrate that the removal of safe abortion options will increase complications and the health risks to pregnant patients. Because the emergency department is a critical access point for reproductive health care, emergency clinicians must be prepared for the policy, clinical, educational, and legal implications of this change. The goal of this paper, therefore, is to describe the impact of the reversal of Roe v. Wade on health equity and reproductive justice, the provision of emergency care education and training, and the specific legal and reproductive consequences for emergency clinicians. Finally, we conclude with specific recommended policy and advocacy responses for emergency medicine clinicians.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineAbortionEquity (law)Supreme courtEmergency contraceptionHealth careMedical emergencyReproductive healthEmergency departmentFamily medicineNursingPregnancyLawFamily planningEnvironmental healthResearch methodologyBiologyGeneticsPolitical sciencePopulationReproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive Health and TechnologiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Post‐Roe emergency medicine: Policy, clinical, training, and individual implications for emergency clinicians | Litcius