The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with synchronous multiple primary malignant neoplasms occurring at the same time
Zhe Huang Luo, Wan Ling Qi, Anan Jin, Feng Xiang Liao, Qian Liu, Qing Yun Zeng
Abstract
Background Synchronous multiple primary malignant neoplasms occurring at the same time (SMPMNS) are not currently uncommon in clinical oncological practice; however, the diagnostic performance of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) for SMPMNS needs further elucidation. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the application of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with SMPMNS. Materials and methods The clinical and imaging data of 37 patients with SMPMNS who had undergone 18 F-FDG PET/CT from October 2010 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The kappa consistency test was applied to evaluate the consistency of the diagnostic performance between PET/CT and conventional imaging (CI). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT and CI in the detection of metastatic lesions were compared. Results This retrospective diagnostic study included 74 lesions identified in 37 patients with SMPMNS, with 94.6% of patients having double primary tumors. Of the incidences of SMPMNS, 18.9% occurred in the same organ system, with respiratory tumors being the most common type of neoplasm (43.2%) and the lung being the most common primary site (40.5%). The overall survival of SMPMNS patients without metastases was longer than that of those with metastases ( χ 2 = 12.627, p = 0.000). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ), the SUV max ratio (larger SUV max /smaller SUV max ), and the difference index of SUV max (DISUV max ) [(larger SUV max − smaller SUV max )/larger SUV max ] of the primary lesions ranged from 0.9 to 41.7 (average = 12.3 ± 7.9), from 0.3 to 26.7 (average = 4.4 ± 6.9), and from 0.0% to 96.3% (average = 50.3% ± 29.3%), respectively. With regard to diagnostic accuracy, PET/CT and CI showed poor consistency ( κ = 0.096, p = 0.173). For the diagnosis of primary lesions (diagnosed and misdiagnosed), PET/CT and CI also showed poor consistency ( κ = 0.277, p = 0.000), but the diagnostic performance of PET/CT was better than that of CI. In the diagnosis of metastases, the patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT were 100.0%, 81.8%, and 89.2%, respectively, while those of CI were 73.3%, 100.0%, 89.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity values were significantly different, with PET/CT having higher sensitivity ( p = 0.02) and CI showing higher specificity ( p = 0.02). Conclusions 18 F-FDG PET/CT improves the diagnostic performance for SMPMNS and is a good imaging modality for patients with SMPMNS.