Incomplete resection of the intracranial electroencephalographic seizure onset zone is not associated with postsurgical outcomes
Sarah J Gascoigne, Nathan Evans, Gerard Hall, Csaba Kozma, Mariella Panagiotopoulou, Gabrielle M. Schroeder, Callum Simpson, Christopher Thornton, Frances Turner, Heather Woodhouse, Jess Blickwedel, Fahmida A Chowdhury, Beate Diehl, John S. Duncan, Ryan Faulder, Rhys H. Thomas, Kevin J. Wilson, Peter N. Taylor, Yujiang Wang
Abstract
Delineation of seizure onset regions using intracranial electroencephalography (icEEG) is vital in the surgical workup of drug-resistant epilepsy cases. However, it is unknown whether the complete resection of these regions is necessary for seizure freedom, or whether postsurgical seizure recurrence can be attributed to the incomplete removal of seizure onset regions. To address this gap, we retrospectively analyzed icEEG recordings from 63 subjects, identifying seizure onset regions visually and algorithmically. We assessed onset region resection and correlated this with postsurgical seizure control. The majority of subjects had more than half of their onset regions resected (82.46% and 80.65% of subjects using visual and algorithmic methods, respectively). There was no association between the proportion of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) that was subsequently resected and better surgical outcomes (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] < .7). Investigating the spatial extent of onset regions, we found no substantial evidence of an association with postsurgical seizure control (all AUC < .7). Although seizure onset regions are typically resected completely or in large part, incomplete resection is not associated with worse postsurgical outcomes. We conclude that postsurgical seizure recurrence cannot be attributed to an incomplete resection of the icEEG SOZ alone. Other network mechanisms beyond icEEG seizure onset likely contribute.