Tafamidis treatment delays structural and functional changes of the left ventricle in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy
René Rettl, Christopher Mann, Franz Duca, Theresa-Marie Dachs, Christina Binder, Luciana Camuz Ligios, Lore Schrutka, Daniel Dalos, Matthias Koschutnik, Carolina Donà, Andreas A. Kammerlander, Dietrich Beitzke, Christian Loewe, Silvia Charwat‐Resl, Christian Hengstenberg, Johannes Kästner, Roza Badr Eslam, Diana Bonderman
Abstract
AIMS: Tafamidis improves outcomes in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). However, it is not yet known whether tafamidis affects cardiac amyloid deposition and structural changes in the myocardium. We aimed to determine disease-modifying effects on myocardial amyloid progression and to identify imaging parameters that could be applied for specific therapy monitoring. METHODS AND RESULTS: ATTR-CM patients underwent serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging using T1 mapping techniques to derive extracellular volume (ECV). Patients receiving tafamidis 61 mg (n = 35) or 20 mg (n = 15) once daily showed stable measurements at follow-up (FU) {61 mg: 9.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.0-11.0] months, 20 mg: 11.0 (IQR 8.0-18.0) months} in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF; 61 mg: 47.6% vs. 47.5%, P = 0.935; 20 mg: 52.4% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.930), LV mass index (LVMI; 61 mg: 110.2 vs. 106.2 g/m2, P = 0.304; 20 mg: 114.5 vs. 115.4 g/m2, P = 0.900), and ECV (61 mg: 47.5% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.861; 20 mg: 56.7% vs. 57.5%, P = 0.759), whereas treatment-naïve ATTR-CM patients (n = 19) had clear signs of disease progression at the end of the observation period [12.0 (IQR 10.0-21.0) months; LVEF: 53.3% vs. 45.7%, P = 0.031; LVMI: 98.9 vs. 106.9 g/m2, P = 0.027; ECV: 49.3% vs. 54.6%, P = 0.023]. Between-group comparison at FU revealed positive effects in tafamidis 61 mg-treated compared to treatment-naïve patients (LVEF: P = 0.035, LVMI: P = 0.036, ECV: P = 0.030), while those treated with 20 mg showed no difference in the above LV measurements when compared with treatment-naïve (P = 0.120, P = 0.287, P = 0.158). However, both treatment groups showed clinically beneficial effects compared to the natural course [61 mg, 6-min walk distance (6-MWD): P = 0.005, N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP): P = 0.002; 20 mg, 6-MWD: P = 0.023, NT-proBNP: P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION: Tafamidis delays myocardial amyloid progression in ATTR-CM patients, resulting in structural, functional, and clinical benefits compared to the natural course. Serial CMR including measurement of ECV may be appropriate for disease-specific therapy monitoring.