Establishing the optimal number of passes during EUS-FNB for diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions: Prospective multicenter study
Benedetto Mangiavillano, Antonio Facciorusso, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Carmelo Barbera, Alberto Larghi, Gianenrico Rizzatti, Silvia Carrara, Andrea Lisotti, Pietro Fusaroli, Luca De Luca, Milena Di Leo, Maria Cristina Conti Bellocchi, Marco Spadaccini, Emanuele Dabizzi, Francesco Auriemma, Serena Stigliano, Daryl Ramai, Federica Calabrese, Erminia Manfrin, Danilo Paduano, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici, Stefano Francesco Crinò
Abstract
Abstract Background and study aims The optimal number of needle passes during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) is not yet established. We aimed to perform a per-pass analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB of solid pancreatic lesions using a 22G Franseen needle. Patients and methods Consecutive patients with solid pancreatic lesions referred to 11 Italian centers were prospectively enrolled. Three needle passes were performed; specimens were collected after each pass and processed individually as standard histology following macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) by the endoscopist. The primary endpoint was diagnostic accuracy of each sequential pass. Final diagnosis was established based on surgical pathology or a clinical course of at least 6 months. Secondary endpoints were specimen adequacy, MOSE reliability, factors impacting diagnostic accuracy, and procedure-related adverse events. Results A total of 504 samples from 168 patients were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy was 90.5% (85.0%–94.1%) after one pass and 97.6% (94.1%–99.3%) after two passes (P=0.01). Similarly, diagnostic sensitivity and sample adequacy were significantly higher adding the second needle pass (90.2%, 84.6%–94.3% vs 97.5%, 93.8%–99.3%, P=0.009 and 91.1%, 85.7%-94.9% vs 98.2%, 95.8%–99.3%, P=0.009, one pass vs two passes, respectively). Accuracy, sensitivity, and adequacy remained the same after the third pass. The concordance between MOSE and histological evaluation was 89.9%. The number of passes was the only factor associated with accuracy. One case of mild acute pancreatitis (0.6%) was managed conservatively. Conclusions At least two passes should be performed for the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions. MOSE is a reliable tool to predict the histological adequacy of specimens.