Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research
Raquel L. Carvalho, Angélica Faria de Resende, Jos Barlow, Filipe França, Mario R. Moura, Rafaella Maciel, Fernanda Alves‐Martins, Jack D. Shutt, Cássio Alencar Nunes, Fernando Elias, Juliana M. Silveira, Lis F. Stegmann, Fabrício Beggiato Baccaro, Leandro Juen, Juliana Schietti, Luiz E. O. C. Aragão, Érika Berenguer, Leandro Castello, Flávia R. C. Costa, Matheus L. Guedes, Cecília Gontijo Leal, Alexander Charles Lees, Victoria Isaac, Rodrigo Oliveira do Nascimento, Oliver L. Phillips, Fernando Augusto Schmidt, Hans ter Steege, Fernando Zagury Vaz‐de‐Mello, Eduardo Martins Venticinque, Ima Célia Guimarães Vieira, Jansen Zuanon, Joice Ferreira
Abstract
(Current Biology 33, 3495–3504.e1–e4; August 21, 2023) In the original version of the article, the authors incorrectly stated the value of current and projected deforestation in the results: the values should be 23.50% and 27.29%, respectively. This error does not impact the results or conclusions presented in the paper. The error has now been corrected online. The authors apologize for the error and any confusion that may have resulted. Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological researchCarvalho et al.Current BiologyJuly 19, 2023In BriefCarvalho et al. map the locations and drivers of ecological research across the Brazilian Amazon. Research facilities and accessibility were strong predictors of research location. Areas with the lowest probability (<0.1%) of research covered about 27.3%, 17.3%, and 54.1% of aquatic, wetland, and upland habitats, respectively. Full-Text PDF Open Access