Short- and long-term outcomes associated with enhanced recovery after surgery protocol <i>vs</i> conventional management in patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrectomy
Yulong Tian, Shou-Gen Cao, Xiaodong Liu, Zequn Li, Gan Liu, Xingqi Zhang, Yuqi Sun, Xin Zhou, Daosheng Wang, Yanbing Zhou
Abstract
BACKGROUND: At present, the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is widely implemented in the field of gastric surgery. However, the effect of the ERAS protocol on the long-term prognosis of gastric cancer has not been reported. AIM: To compare the effects of ERAS and conventional protocols on short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis after laparoscopic gastrectomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1026 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy between 2012 and 2015. The patients were divided into either an ERAS group or a conventional group. The groups were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores based on covariates that affect cancer survival. The primary outcomes were the 5-year overall and cancer-specific survival rates. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative short-term outcomes and inflammatory indexes. RESULTS: = 0.044). CONCLUSION: Adherence to the ERAS protocol improves both the short-term outcomes and the 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients after laparoscopic gastrectomy.