Joint Coordinate Optimization in Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning
Mohammad Nabati, Seyed Ali Ghorashi, Reza Shahbazian
Abstract
Fingerprint-based indoor positioning uses pattern recognition algorithms (PRAs) to estimate the users’ locations in wireless local area network environments, where satellite-based positioning methods cannot work properly. Traditionally, the training phase of PRA is separately conducted for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$x$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$y$ </tex-math></inline-formula> coordinates. However, the received signal strength from access points is a unique fingerprint for each measured point, not for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$x$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$y$ </tex-math></inline-formula> coordinates separately. In this letter, we propose a method to jointly employ the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$x$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$y$ </tex-math></inline-formula> coordinates during the training phase using a novel PRA-based Gaussian process regression (GPR), named 2D-GPR. Experimental results show that the proposed 2D-GPR improves the accuracy of positioning more than <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$40cm$ </tex-math></inline-formula> in limited data samples and has a lower calculation cost compared with conventional GPR.