Robot-assisted fracture fixation in orthopaedic trauma surgery: a systematic review
Henk Jan Schuijt, Dennis Hundersmarck, Diederik Pieter Johan Smeeing, Detlef van der Velde, Michael John Weaver
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the applications of robot-assisted surgery and its effect on surgical outcomes in orthopaedic trauma patients. Data Sources: A search was performed in PubMed and Embase for articles in English, Dutch, German, or French, without restrictions on follow-up times, study size, or year of publication. Study Selection: Studies were included if they investigated patients undergoing robot-assisted fracture fixation surgery for orthopaedic trauma. Data Extraction: Outcomes studied were operating time, fluoroscopy time/frequency, complications, functional outcomes, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing, and screw placement accuracy. Critical appraisal was done by using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Data Synthesis: Narrative review. Conclusions: A total of 3832 hits were identified with the search and 8 studies were included with a combined total of 437 included patients, 3 retrospective cohort studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 1 cohort study not otherwise specified, 1 case series, and 1 randomized controlled trial. Four studies investigated pelvic ring fractures, 3 studies investigated femur fractures, and 1 study investigated scaphoid fractures. Seven investigated percutaneous screw fixation and 1 studied intramedullary nail fixation. One robotic system was used across all studies, the TiRobot, and all procedures were performed in China. The limited evidence suggests that that robot-assisted orthopaedic trauma surgery may reduce operating time, use of fluoroscopy, intraoperative blood loss, and improve screw placement accuracy, but the overall quality of evidence was low with a high risk of bias. Robot-assisted fracture fixation does not appear to lead to better functional outcomes for the patient. Level of evidence: III