68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT on gross tumour volume delineation for radiotherapy planning of oesophageal cancer
Liang Zhao, Shanyu Chen, Sijia Chen, Yizhen Pang, Yaqing Dai, Shenping Hu, Lie Lin, Lirong Fu, Long Sun, Hua Wu, Haojun Chen, Qin Lin
Abstract
Background and purposeTo compare 68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) and 18F-FDG PET/CT in imaging locally advanced oesophageal cancer, and evaluate the potential usefulness of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT on gross target volume (GTV) delineation aimed at radiotherapy planning for oesophageal cancer as compared with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) and 18F-FDG PET/CT.Materials and methodsTwenty-one patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer who underwent both 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT scans were selected. GTVs of the primary tumours based on CE-CT (GTVCT), PET/CT, and CE-CT plus PET/CT were delineated. Gross tumour lengths were measured by GTVs and endoscopy and recorded.ResultsThe 68Ga-FAPI PET showed significantly higher radiotracer uptake than 18F-FDG PET (median SUVmax 16.71 vs. 11.23; P = 0.002) in the primary tumours. SUV thresholds of FAPI ×20%, 30%, 40%, and FDG ×40% showed similar lesion lengths compared with that in endoscopic examination (P > 0.05). GTVCT demonstrated the largest volume (median: 48.80 mm3, range: 14.83–162.23 mm3) than PET-based GTVs. For PET/CT-guided complementary contouring of GTVCT, four patients (19%) were increased by FAPI ×20% and 30%, two patients (9.5%) were increased by FAPI ×40%, and only one patient was increased by FDG ×40%. Furthermore, the volume of GTV based on CE-CT plus FAPI ×20%, 30%, and 40% showed no significant difference with GTVCT and planning target volume based CE-CT plus FAPI-PET and meets the organ at risk standard.ConclusionThe 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT methodology showed favourable tumour-to-background contrast in oesophageal cancer and might provide additional information for target volume delineation and help avoid tumour geographic misses.