Litcius/Paper detail

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a new insulin pump system containing isobornyl acrylate

Johanna Enberg, Nils Hamnerius, Martin Mowitz

2023Contact Dermatitis12 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Isobornyl acrylate (IBOA) has been identified as a major culprit allergen in several glucose sensors and insulin pumps during the past few years. Many cases of IBOA-induced allergic contact dermatitis are related to prolonged use of the FreeStyle Libre sensor (Abbott Diabetes Care, Witney, Oxfordshire, UK).1-3 We report a case on a 6-year-old boy with diabetes mellitus type 1 and atopic dermatitis who developed allergic contact dermatitis from the Orbit microinfusion set used together with the insulin pump Mylife YpsoPump (Ypsomed AG, Burgdorf, Switzerland), a medical device not previously linked to IBOA contact allergy. The patient was diagnosed with diabetes on 7 December 2020. Between 11 December and 15 December, he was equipped with the sensor FreeStyle Libre. On 16 December the sensor was exchanged for the continuous glucose monitoring system Dexcom G6 (Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, California). In January 2021, he received the YpsoPump insulin pump. In April 2021, he developed acute eczema located under the Dexcom G6 device and after another few months a rash appeared underneath the YpsoPump infusion set (Figure 1). The patient was investigated with patch test that included selected substances from the baseline series and an in-house medical device series. Patch testing was also performed with acetone extracts made from the adhesive patches and plastic support material from the insulin infusion set and sensor. Each material was extracted in acetone in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min. Thereafter, all extracts were evaporated to a final volume of 0.5 ml. Patch tests were applied on the back and left in occlusion for 48 h using IQ Ultimate chambers (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Vellinge, Sweden). Reactions were read on day (D) 4 and D7. Scoring was performed according to the criteria of the International Contact Dermatitis Group (ICDRG).4 At the first reading on D4, the patient had an extreme (+++) reaction to IBOA 0.3% in petrolatum (pet), a strong (++) reaction to IBOA 0.1% in pet, and a weak (+) reaction to IBOA 0.01% in pet, respectively (Figure 1). Doubtful reactions to sesquiterpene lactone mix and alantolactone were observed. Unfortunately, due to illness of a family member, the patient could not appear for test reading on D7. At photographs taken on D7 no new reactions could be identified. However, on D10 a new reaction was observed and photographed by the patient's guardian. When inspecting the photo, the preparation giving the positive reaction was interpreted to be dicyclohexylmethane-4,4′-diisocyanate (DMDI) 1% in pet. The patient's guardian declined further testing. The extracts of the devices were analysed by gas-chromatography–mass spectrometry (GCMS).5 IBOA was found in all four extracts in concentrations corresponding to a total amount of 0.4–0.8 μg IBOA in each material. The surface concentration was 0.02 μg/cm2 in the adhesive patch from the infusion set and 0.03 μg/cm2 in the adhesive patch from the Dexcom G6 sensor. The GCMS analyses also indicated the presence of DMDI in the extract made from the plastic part of the infusion set. To the best of our knowledge, IBOA content or allergic contact dermatitis related to the YpsoPump insulin pump has not previously been reported. Based on the patient's history and the result from patch tests and chemical investigation it is likely that sensitization was caused by IBOA from the Dexcom G6 glucose sensor or the YpsoPump insulin pump. In previous reports, contact allergy to IBOA in most cases has been associated to prolonged use of FreeStyle Libre sensors,1 a device our patient had used for only 6 days. Abbott themselves proclaimed the sensos would be IBOA free from 31 July 2020.6 Based on this information and our knowledge at date, the patent's FreeStyle Libre sensor most likely contained low levels of IBOA, if any. Therefore, it is highly doubtful that the patient would have been sensitized by this device. Furthermore, dermatitis occurred only first after several months use of Dexcom G6 (April 2021). In analyses of adhesive patches from early versions of FreeStyle Libre, surface concentrations of IBOA between 0.2 and 6 μg/cm2 have been found.1, 7 As a comparison, our chemical analysis indicates a low quantity of IBOA in both medical devices. The patient did not show any reactions to the tested adhesive patches nor plastic support material. The clinical picture in this case is most likely explained by the long-term exposure of the medical devices to the skin. Also contact allergy to DMDI may have contributed to the reaction to the infusion set. As we previously have seen indications of isocyanates being present in diabetes devices,8 at the time of testing our medical device series contained isophorone diisocyanate and DMDI. Recently Dendooven et al. have reported on isocyanates as potential allergens in diabetes devices and wound dressings.9 In the case reported here the reaction was noticed on D10. Late-appearing patch test reactions may indicate active sensitization. However, patch test reactions to isocyanates are known to sometimes appear late, also after the D7 reading in sensitized individuals.10 As the patient's guardian declined further investigation, no supplementary patch testing with DMDI was performed. The following case report present another insulin pump system added to the list of IBOA-containing medical devices for diabetes management. This case indicates that comparatively low levels of IBOA are enough to sensitize and cause allergic contact dermatitis. Moreover, the case highlights the difficulty of evaluation of clinical relevance as well as to give recommendations about medical devices. Johanna Enberg: Investigation; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Nils Hamnerius: Investigation; validation; visualization; writing – review and editing; project administration; supervision; conceptualization. Martin Mowitz: Conceptualization; writing – original draft; software; writing – review and editing; project administration; formal analysis; supervision; data curation; methodology; validation; visualization; investigation. The patient's guardian has given informed consent to the publication of the case details and photographs. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Topics & Concepts

Allergic contact dermatitisContact dermatitisAcrylateInsulin pumpDermatologyAllergyMedicineImmunopathologyChemistryOrganic chemistryImmunologyDiabetes mellitusCopolymerType 1 diabetesPolymerEndocrinologyBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a new insulin pump system containing isobornyl acrylate | Litcius