Understanding the Role of Imide‐Based Salts and Borate‐Based Additives for Safe and High‐Performance Glyoxal‐Based Electrolytes in Ni‐Rich NMC <sub>811</sub> Cathodes for Li‐Ion Batteries.
M. P. Klein, Markus Binder, Matjaž Koželj, Adriano Pierini, Tom Gouveia, Thomas Diemant, Annika R. Schür, Sergio Brutti, Enrico Bodo, Dominic Bresser, Juan Luis Gómez‐Urbano, Andrea Balducci
Abstract
Abstract Herein, the design of novel and safe electrolyte formulations for high‐voltage Ni‐rich cathodes is reported. The solvent mixture comprising 1,1,2,2‐tetraethoxyethane and propylene carbonate not only displays good transport properties, but also greatly enhances the overall safety of the cell thanks to its low flammability. The influence of the conducting salts, that is, lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) and lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), and of the additives lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB) and lithium difluoro(oxalato)borate (LiDFOB) is examined. Molecular dynamics simulations are carried out to gain insights into the local structure of the different electrolytes and the lithium‐ion coordination. Furthermore, special emphasis is placed on the film‐forming abilities of the salts to suppress the anodic dissolution of the aluminum current collector and to create a stable cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI). In this regard, the borate‐based additives significantly alleviate the intrinsic challenges associated with the use of LiTFSI and LiFSI salts. It is worth remarking that a superior cathode performance is achieved by using the LiFSI/LiDFOB electrolyte, displaying a high specific capacity of 164 mAh g −1 at 6 C and ca. 95% capacity retention after 100 cycles at 1 C. This is attributed to the rich chemistry of the generated CEI layer, as confirmed by ex situ X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy.