Litcius/Paper detail

Electrolyte materials for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells: Main limitations and potential solutions

Anna V. Kasyanova, Inna A. Zvonareva, Natalia Tarasova, Lei Bi, Dmitry A. Medvedev, Zongping Shao

2022Materials Reports Energy83 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) and electrolysis cells (SOECs) are promising energy conversion devices, on whose basis green hydrogen energy technologies can be developed to support the transition to a carbon-free future. As compared with oxygen-conducting cells, the operational temperatures of protonic ceramic fuel cells (PCFCs) and electrolysis cells (PCECs) can be reduced by several hundreds of degrees (down to low- and intermediate-temperature ranges of 400–700 °C) while maintaining high performance and efficiency. This is due to the distinctive characteristics of charge carriers for proton-conducting electrolytes. However, despite achieving outstanding lab-scale performance, the prospects for industrial scaling of PCFCs and PCECs remain hazy, at least in the near future, in contrast to commercially available SOFCs and SOECs. In this review, we reveal the reasons for the delayed technological development, which need to be addressed in order to transfer fundamental findings into industrial processes. Possible solutions to the identified problems are also highlighted.

Topics & Concepts

ElectrolyteElectrolysisMaterials scienceCeramicOxideElectrochemistryPolymer electrolyte membrane electrolysisElectrochemical energy conversionNanotechnologyFuel cellsChemical engineeringProcess engineeringElectrodeChemistryMetallurgyEngineeringPhysical chemistryAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFuel Cells and Related MaterialsChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Electrolyte materials for protonic ceramic electrochemical cells: Main limitations and potential solutions | Litcius