Litcius/Paper detail

Testing the Accuracy of Pont’s Index in Diagnosing Maxillary Transverse Discrepancy as Compared to the University of Pennsylvania CBCT Analysis

Dana Feştilă, Aurelia Magdalena Enache, Evelyn Beatrix Nagy, Mihaela Hedeșiu, Mircea Ghergie

2022Dentistry Journal10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment of maxillary transverse discrepancy requires an accurate tool in order to implement the appropriate treatment plan. Aim: To evaluate the accuracy of Pont’s Index in confirming a transverse maxillary deficiency by comparing its results with the corresponding results yielded by the University of Pennsylvania CBCT analysis. Material and methods: The study was performed on dental casts and CBCT’s of 60 randomly selected patients by adopting a cluster sampling method. The results of Pont’s Index and University of Pennsylvania CBCT analysis were analyzed through McNemar’s test using Excel Data Analysis, and the accuracy indicators for Pont’s Index were computed using MedCalc Ltd. Results: Mc Nemar’s test revealed a p-value of 0.85. The accuracy indicators of Pont’s Index were: sensitivity: 69%; specificity: 16.6%; positive predictive value: 65%; negative predictive value: 18.75%; positive likelihood ratio: 0.83; negative likelihood ratio: 1.86; and accuracy: 53.28%. Conclusion: Due to the fact that CBCT is not used on a daily basis and Pont’s Index has a relatively high sensitivity (69%) making it suitable to detect patients with a narrow maxilla, assessment of the maxillary deficiency on CBCT can be recommended for cases were the midpalatal suture maturation should be evaluated.

Topics & Concepts

McNemar's testMedicineMaxillaOrthodonticsDentistryPredictive valueIndex (typography)Diagnostic accuracyNuclear medicineStatisticsMathematicsRadiologyComputer scienceInternal medicineWorld Wide WebOrthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsDental Radiography and ImagingDental Education, Practice, Research
Testing the Accuracy of Pont’s Index in Diagnosing Maxillary Transverse Discrepancy as Compared to the University of Pennsylvania CBCT Analysis | Litcius