Litcius/Paper detail

The Origin of Parity Violation in Polarized Dust Emission and Implications for Cosmic Birefringence

Susan E. Clark, Chang‐Goo Kim, J. Colin Hill, Brandon S. Hensley

2021The Astrophysical Journal66 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Recent measurements of Galactic polarized dust emission have found a nonzero TB signal, a correlation between the total intensity and the B -mode polarization component. We present evidence that this parity-odd signal is driven by the relative geometry of the magnetic field and the filamentary interstellar medium in projection. Using neutral hydrogen morphology and Planck polarization data, we find that the angle between intensity structures and the plane-of-sky magnetic field orientation is predictive of the signs of Galactic TB and EB . Our results suggest that magnetically misaligned filamentary dust structures introduce nonzero TB and EB correlations in the dust polarization, and that the intrinsic dust EB can be predicted from measurements of dust TB and TE over the same sky mask. We predict correlations between TE , TB , EB , and EE / BB , and confirm our predictions using synthetic dust polarization maps from magnetohydrodynamic simulations. We introduce and measure a scale-dependent effective magnetic misalignment angle, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ψ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ℓ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>dust</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo>∼</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>°</mml:mo> </mml:math> for 100 ≲ ℓ ≲ 500, and predict a positive intrinsic dust EB with amplitude <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mfenced close="〉" open="〈"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ℓ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="italic">EB</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> <mml:mo>≲</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn> <mml:mspace width="0.25em"/> <mml:mi>μ</mml:mi> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>CMB</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> for the same multipole range at 353 GHz over our sky mask. Both the sign and amplitude of the Galactic EB signal can change with the sky area considered. Our results imply that searches for parity violation in the cosmic microwave background must account for the nonzero Galactic EB and TB signals, necessitating revision of existing analyses of the evidence for cosmic birefringence.

Topics & Concepts

PhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundAstrophysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)AmplitudeSkyGalactic planeMagnetic fieldPlanckAnisotropyInterstellar mediumOpticsGalaxyQuantum mechanicsChemistryPhysical chemistryAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena