Telepsychiatry versus face-to-face treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Katsuhiko Hagi, Shunya Kurokawa, Akihiro Takamiya, Mayu Fujikawa, Shotaro Kinoshita, Mari Iizuka, Shota Furukawa, Yoko Eguchi, Taishiro Kishimoto
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare significantly and telepsychiatry is now the primary means of treatment in some countries. Aims To compare the efficacy of telepsychiatry and face-to-face treatment. Method A comprehensive meta-analysis comparing telepsychiatry with face-to-face treatment for psychiatric disorders. The primary outcome was the mean change in the standard symptom scale scores used for each psychiatric disorder. Secondary outcomes included all meta-analysable outcomes, such as all-cause discontinuation and safety/tolerability. Results We identified 32 studies ( n = 3592 participants) across 11 mental illnesses. Disease-specific analyses showed that telepsychiatry was superior to face-to-face treatment regarding symptom improvement for depressive disorders ( k = 6 studies, n = 561; standardised mean difference s.m.d. = −0.325, 95% CI −0.640 to −0.011, P = 0.043), whereas face-to-face treatment was superior to telepsychiatry for eating disorder ( k = 1, n = 128; s.m.d. = 0.368, 95% CI 0.018–0.717, P = 0.039). No significant difference was seen between telepsychiatry and face-to-face treatment when all the studies/diagnoses were combined ( k = 26, n = 2290; P = 0.248). Telepsychiatry had significantly fewer all-cause discontinuations than face-to-face treatment for mild cognitive impairment ( k = 1, n = 61; risk ratio RR = 0.552, 95% CI 0.312–0.975, P = 0.040), whereas the opposite was seen for substance misuse ( k = 1, n = 85; RR = 37.41, 95% CI 2.356–594.1, P = 0.010). No significant difference regarding all-cause discontinuation was seen between telepsychiatry and face-to-face treatment when all the studies/diagnoses were combined ( k = 27, n = 3341; P = 0.564). Conclusions Telepsychiatry achieved a symptom improvement effect for various psychiatric disorders similar to that of face-to-face treatment. However, some superiorities/inferiorities were seen across a few specific psychiatric disorders, suggesting that its efficacy may vary according to disease type.