Litcius/Paper detail

The efficacy of different implant surface decontamination methods using spectrophotometric analysis: an<i>in vitro</i>study

Roberto Giffi, Davide Pietropaoli, Leonardo Mancini, Francesco Tarallo, Philipp Sahrmann, Enrico Marchetti

2022Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: debridement efficiency of multiple decontamination methods (Gracey curettes [GC], glycine air-polishing [G-Air], erythritol air-polishing [E-Air] and titanium brushes [TiB]) using a novel spectrophotometric ink-model in 3 different bone defect settings (30°, 60°, and 90°). METHODS: Forty-five dental implants were stained with indelible ink and mounted in resin models, which simulated standardised peri-implantitis defects with different bone defect angulations (30°, 60°, and 90°). After each run of instrumentation, the implants were removed from the resin model, and the ink was dissolved in ethanol (97%). A spectrophotometric analysis was performed to detect colour remnants in order to measure the cumulative uncleaned surface area of the implants. Scanning electron microscopy images were taken to assess micromorphological surface changes. RESULTS: 0.0007). GE-Air appeared to be the least efficient method for biofilm debridement. CONCLUSIONS: ink studies.

Topics & Concepts

Human decontaminationPeri-implantitisDebridement (dental)Materials scienceImplantScanning electron microscopeBiomedical engineeringDentistryMedicineComposite materialSurgeryPathologyDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsDental materials and restorations