Litcius/Paper detail

Is reanalysis selective when regressions are consciously controlled?

Dario Paape, Shravan Vasishth

2022Glossa Psycholinguistics30 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

The selective reanalysis hypothesis of Frazier and Rayner (1982) states that when faced with the need to reanalyze a syntactic ambiguity, readers direct their eyes towards the region in the sentence inducing the ambiguity (e.g., Since Jay always jogs a mile seems like a short distance to him). Given the mixed evidence for this proposal in the literature, we investigated the possibility that selective reanalysis is tied to conscious awareness of the garden-path effect. To this end, we adapted the well-known self-paced reading paradigm to allow for regressive as well as progressive key presses. Assuming that regressions in such a paradigm are consciously controlled, we found no evidence for selective reanalysis, but rather for occasional extensive, heterogeneous rereading of garden-path sentences. We discuss the implications of our findings for the selective reanalysis hypothesis, the role of awareness in sentence processing, as well as the usefulness of the bidirectional self-paced reading method for sentence processing research.

Topics & Concepts

AmbiguityReading (process)SentenceSentence processingPath (computing)Cognitive psychologyLinguisticsPsychologyKey (lock)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePhilosophyComputer securityProgramming languageNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Is reanalysis selective when regressions are consciously controlled? | Litcius