Revascularization vs. Conservative Medical Treatment in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Guang‐zhi Liao, Yiming Li, Lin Bai, Yu‐yang Ye, Yong Peng
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As a strong risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) indicates higher mortality in patients with CAD. However, the optimal treatment for the patients with two coexisting diseases is still not well defined. METHODS: To conduct a meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database were searched for studies comparing medical treatment (MT) and revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] in adults with CAD and CKD. Long-term all-cause mortality was evaluated, and subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 13 trials met our selection criteria. Long-term (with at least a 1-year follow-up) mortality was significantly lower in the revascularization arm [relative risk (RR) = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.60-0.72] by either PCI (RR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.55-0.68) or CABG (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.46-0.84). The results were consistent in dialysis patients (RR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.59-0.79), patients with stable CAD (RR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.61-0.92), patients with acute coronary syndrome (RR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.58-0.66), and geriatric patients (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.54-0.61). CONCLUSION: In patients with CKD and CAD, revascularization is more effective in reducing mortality than MT alone. This observed benefit is consistent in patients with stable CAD and elderly patients. However, future randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are required to confirm these findings.