Litcius/Paper detail

Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models

Masaoki Kusunoki, Kazufumi Kikuchi, Osamu Togao, Koji Yamashita, Daichi Momosaka, Yoshitomo Kikuchi, Daisuke Kuga, Nobuhiro Hata, Masahiro Mizoguchi, Koji Iihara, Satoshi O. Suzuki, Toru Iwaki, Yuta Akamine, Akio Hiwatashi

2020Neuroradiology25 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an important role in the preoperative assessment of gliomas; however, the diagnostic performance of histogram-derived parameters from mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential DWI models in the grading of gliomas has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we compared these models' ability to differentiate between high-grade and low-grade gliomas. METHODS: This retrospective study included 22 patients with diffuse gliomas (age, 23-74 years; 12 males; 11 high-grade and 11 low-grade gliomas) who underwent preoperative 3 T-magnetic resonance imaging from October 2014 to August 2019. The apparent diffusion coefficient was calculated from the mono-exponential model. Using 13 b-values, the true-diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were obtained from the bi-exponential model, and the distributed-diffusion coefficient and heterogeneity index were obtained from the stretched-exponential model. Region-of-interests were drawn on each imaging parameter map for subsequent histogram analyses. RESULTS: The skewness of the apparent diffusion, true-diffusion, and distributed-diffusion coefficients was significantly higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas (0.67 ± 0.67 vs. - 0.18 ± 0.63, 0.68 ± 0.74 vs. - 0.08 ± 0.66, 0.63 ± 0.72 vs. - 0.15 ± 0.73; P = 0.0066, 0.0192, and 0.0128, respectively). The 10th percentile of the heterogeneity index was significantly lower (0.77 ± 0.08 vs. 0.88 ± 0.04; P = 0.0004), and the 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction was significantly higher (12.64 ± 3.44 vs. 7.14 ± 1.70%: P < 0.0001), in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas. The combination of the 10th percentile of the true-diffusion coefficient and 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction showed the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.96). CONCLUSION: The bi-exponential model exhibited the best diagnostic performance for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas.

Topics & Concepts

Effective diffusion coefficientMedicineNuclear medicineDiffusion MRIPercentileMagnetic resonance imagingIntravoxel incoherent motionDiffusionGliomaDiffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroradiologyGrading (engineering)RadiologyNeurologyMathematicsStatisticsPhysicsPsychiatryThermodynamicsEngineeringCancer researchCivil engineeringGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsMRI in cancer diagnosis