Muscle plays a more superior role than fat in bone homeostasis: A cross-sectional study of old Asian people
Chaoran Liu, Pui Yan Wong, Xin Tong, Simon Kwoon‐Ho Chow, Vivian Hung, Wing‐Hoi Cheung, Ling Qin, Sheung Wai Law, Ronald Man Yeung Wong
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to discover the role of fat and muscle in bone structures, as well as the relationship between obesity and sarcopenia on age-related osteoporosis. Methods A total of 400 participants (65.0 ± 8.2 years old, 42.3% women) were recruited. Fat, muscle, bone parameters, basic demographics, medical history, physical performance and activity, and calcium intake of participants were obtained from datasets. The diagnosis of osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and obesity was based on current recommendations. Pearson correlation, non-linear regression models, and decision tree analyses were performed to study the relationship between fat, muscle, and bone. Logistic regression analyses were used to explore the risk of osteoporosis in old people with obesity or sarcopenia via Model 1 (unadjusted) and Model 2 (adjusted by age, physical activity, and calcium intake). Results Correlation analysis showed that limb muscle mass and index, and age were best related to bone mineral density (BMD) (| r| = 0.386–0.632, p < 0.001). On the contrary, body mass index (BMI) and increased body fat percentage (BF%) were harmful for bone health. An increase of BMI and fat mass index slowed the increase of BMD in the spine, while skeletal muscle mass index accelerated the increase. People with sarcopenia had low muscle mass and strength. When separating subjects into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia status, sarcopenia was independently related to higher risks of osteoporosis in both models (OR > 1, p < 0.05). BMI-defined obesity in Model 1 as well as BF%-defined obesity in both models did not reduce the risk of osteoporosis in both models ( p > 0.05). The decision tree classification (85% accuracy) showed that greater body weight and larger lower limb muscle performance were negatively related to osteoporosis, while fat mass and percentage did not play roles in this prediction. Conclusion Low muscle mass and function were harmful to bone health. Obesity defined by both BMI and BF% had limited protective roles in osteoporosis. The benefits for bone from increased muscle mass and function play a more superior role than increased fat mass in old people. Sarcopenia prevention and treatment instead of controlling obesity should be recommended as an approach to reduce the risks of age-related osteoporosis and fragility fracture for elderly people.