Litcius/Paper detail

There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap

Daniel W. Tigard

2020Philosophy & Technology181 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract In a landmark essay, Andreas Matthias claimed that current developments in autonomous, artificially intelligent (AI) systems are creating a so-called responsibility gap, which is allegedly ever-widening and stands to undermine both the moral and legal frameworks of our society. But how severe is the threat posed by emerging technologies? In fact, a great number of authors have indicated that the fear is thoroughly instilled. The most pessimistic are calling for a drastic scaling-back or complete moratorium on AI systems, while the optimists aim to show that the gap can be bridged nonetheless. Contrary to both camps, I argue against the prevailing assumption that there is a technology-based responsibility gap. I show how moral responsibility is a dynamic and flexible process, one that can effectively encompass emerging technological entities.

Topics & Concepts

Philosophy of technologyPessimismMoral responsibilityEnvironmental ethicsEmerging technologiesHuman enhancementProcess (computing)Law and economicsPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy of scienceEpistemologyLawComputer sciencePhilosophyArtificial intelligenceOperating systemNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical InnovationsEthics and Social Impacts of AIFree Will and Agency