Will COVID-19 be evidence-based medicine’s nemesis?
Trisha Greenhalgh
Abstract
Once defined in rhetorical but ultimately meaningless terms as "the conscientious, judicious and explicit use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients" [1], evidence-based medicine rests on certain philosophical assumptions: a singular truth, ascertainable through empirical enquiry; a linear logic of causality in which interventions have particular effect sizes; rigour defined primarily in methodological terms (especially, a hierarchy of preferred study designs and tools for detecting bias); and a deconstructive approach to problem-solving (the evidence base is built by answering focused questions, typically framed as 'PICO'-population-intervention-comparison-outcome)
Topics & Concepts
Psychological interventionRigourIntervention (counseling)Philosophy of medicinePopulationCausality (physics)Health careMedicinePublic healthEvidence-based medicinePsychologyMEDLINEAlternative medicineLawEpistemologyPolitical scienceNursingPhysicsEnvironmental healthPathologyPhilosophyQuantum mechanicsClimate Change and Health ImpactsCOVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare cost, quality, practices