Removal of mandibular third molars: An overview of risks, a proposal for international community and guidance
Mohammed Murad, Lolwa M S Al-Maslamani, Julian Yates
Abstract
The aim of this proposal is to (1) review the current literature, (2) shed light on the importance of creating universally accepted guidelines, (3) provide help and guidance in the decision-making process with regard to the removal of mandibular third molars (M3Ms), and (4) reduce the risk of exposing the patient to unnecessary harm and complications due to the inappropriate removal or retention of M3Ms.It is obvious that the indications for the extraction of M3Ms will continue to be an area of controversy and strong debate.The evidence for or against prophylactic extraction is ambivalent; there is evidence to accept or reject the stance against prophylactic extraction in some specific cases, and there are published articles to support both opposing views.The available guidelines on the extraction of third molars are limited in number, and are mostly tailored to fit specific settings or countries.There are no available guidelines that might be widely used to help in the decision-making process for the international community.We hope this proposal will constitute an important first step toward creating universally accepted guidance.horizontal, or transverse) or non-impacted (fully erupted).Although both impacted and non-impacted mandibular third molars (M3Ms) can be asymptomatic and disease-free, their eruption can sometimes be associated with significant pain, inflammation, swelling, difficulties in mastication, limited mouth opening, and/or acute pericoronitis.In some cases, these pathologies may be significant enough to cause considerable discomfort and facial swelling, thereby contributing to morbidity in the affected individuals.