Litcius/Paper detail

Real-Life Effectiveness and Safety of Baricitinib as Adjunctive to Standard-of-Care Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019

Nikolaos Tziolos, Emmanouil Karofylakis, Ioannis Grigoropoulos, Pinelopi Kazakou, Emmanouil Koullias, Athina Savva, Hariklia Kranidioti, Αιμιλία Πελεκάνου, Anna Boulouta, Maria Pirounaki, Sotirios Tsiodras, Georgios Georgiopoulos, Dimitrios T. Boumpas, Dimitra Kavatha, Κonstantinos Thomas, Dimitrios Vassilopoulos, Anastasia Antoniadou

2021Open Forum Infectious Diseases10 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Abstract Background Therapeutic options for hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (sCOVID-19) are limited. Preliminary data have shown promising results with baricitinib, but real-life experience is lacking. We assessed the safety and effectiveness of add-on baricitinib to standard-of-care (SOC) including dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with sCOVID-19. Methods This study is a 2-center, observational, retrospective cohort study of patients with sCOVID-19, comparing outcomes and serious events between patients treated with SOC versus those treated with SOC and baricitinib combination. Results We included 369 patients with sCOVID-19 (males 66.1%; mean age 65.2 years; median symptom duration 6 days). The SOC was administered in 47.7% and combination in 52.3%. Patients treated with the combination reached the composite outcome (intensive care unit [ICU] admission or death) less frequently compared with SOC (22.3% vs 36.9%, P = .002). Mortality rate was lower with the combination in the total cohort (14.7% vs 26.6%, P = .005), and ICU admission was lower in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (29.7% vs 44.8%, P = .03). By multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36–2.44, per 10-year increase), partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = .52–0.68, per 10 units increase), and use of high-flow nasal cannula (OR = 0.34; 95% CI, .16–0.74) were associated with the composite outcome, whereas baricitinib use was marginally not associated with the composite outcome (OR = 0.52; 95% CI, .26–1.03). However, baricitinib use was found to be significant after inverse-probability weighted regression (OR = 0.93; 95% CI, .87–0.99). No difference in serious events was noted between treatment groups. Conclusions In real-life settings, addition of baricitinib to SOC in patients hospitalized with sCOVID-19 is associated with decreased mortality without concerning safety signals.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineOdds ratioConfidence intervalIntensive care unitFraction of inspired oxygenNasal cannulaInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyCohortCohort studySurgeryMechanical ventilationCannulaCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment