Litcius/Paper detail

Bias Breakers: Continuous Practice for Admissions and Selection Committees

Sunny Nakae, Ann‐Gel S. Palermo, Mary Sun, Roohi Byakod, Tammy La

2022MedEdPORTAL13 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Introduction: Admissions and selection committees face challenges in identifying and mitigating biases in policies, processes, and discussions. Past bias training has focused on defining bias and presenting the negative impact of bias for committees. Methods: = 126), largely medical school faculty, involved in MD, MD/PhD, and residency program selection at participating schools. A paired pre- and postworkshop assessment was conducted for each session to determine effectiveness of the workshop. Results: s < .001). Participants reported in their comments that the workshop was effective in establishing a safe and judgment-free learning environment to explore and identify biases and build skills and confidence for mitigating them. Discussion: Interactive and applied bias training can be an effective strategy to advance committee culture and practice in recognizing and mitigating bias. This workshop provides committees with ongoing tools for equity practice in selection and decision-making.

Topics & Concepts

Selection biasSelection (genetic algorithm)Equity (law)PsychologyMedical educationSession (web analytics)Test (biology)Applied psychologyMedicineComputer sciencePolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceBiologyLawPaleontologyWorld Wide WebPathologyMedical Education and AdmissionsDiversity and Career in MedicineInnovations in Medical Education