Litcius/Paper detail

Clinical Application of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Sang-Min Oh, Hyeonju Jeong, Euijin Chang, Pyoeng Gyun Choe, Chang Kyung Kang, Wan Beom Park, Taek Soo Kim, Woon Yong Kwon, Myoung‐don Oh, Nam Joong Kim

2021Journal of Korean Medical Science33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

We evaluated the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. We applied both tests to patients who were about to be hospitalized, had visited an emergency room, or had been admitted due to COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR. Two nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained; one was tested by RT-PCR and the other by the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test. A total of 118 pairs of tests from 98 patients were performed between January 5 and 11, 2021. The overall sensitivity and specificity for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) for the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag test compared to RT-PCR were 17.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.8-32.0%) and 100% (95% CI, 95.3-100.0%). Analysis of the results using RT-PCR cycle thresholds of ≤ 30 or ≤ 25 increased the sensitivity to 26.9% (95% CI, 13.7-46.1%), and 41.1% (95% CI, 21.6-64.0%), respectively.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Confidence intervalMedicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Internal medicineReverse transcription polymerase chain reaction2019-20 coronavirus outbreakReal-time polymerase chain reactionGold standard (test)Polymerase chain reactionVirologyCoronavirusGastroenterologyBiologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseGeneOutbreakMessenger RNABiochemistrySARS-CoV-2 detection and testingSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques