Litcius/Paper detail

Evaluating the effectiveness of undergraduate clinical education programs

John W. Ragsdale, Andrea Berry, Jennifer W. Gibson, Christiane Herber-Valdez, Lauren J. Germain, Deborah L. Engle, representing the Program Evaluation Special Interest Group of the Southern Group on Educational Affairs (SGEA) within the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC)

2020Medical Education Online41 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Medical schools should use a variety of measures to evaluate the effectiveness of their clinical curricula. Both outcome measures and process measures should be included, and these can be organized according to the four-level training evaluation model developed by Donald Kirkpatrick. Managing evaluation data requires the institution to employ deliberate strategies to monitor signals in real-time and aggregate data so that informed decisions can be made. Future steps in program evaluation includes increased emphasis on patient outcomes and multi-source feedback, as well as better integration of existing data sources.

Topics & Concepts

Variety (cybernetics)CurriculumProcess (computing)Medical educationComputer scienceOutcome (game theory)Aggregate dataProgram evaluationManagement sciencePsychologyMedicineArtificial intelligencePedagogyEngineeringPublic administrationPathologyMathematical economicsPolitical scienceMathematicsOperating systemInnovations in Medical EducationRadiology practices and educationHealth Sciences Research and Education
Evaluating the effectiveness of undergraduate clinical education programs | Litcius