Litcius/Paper detail

Genotype–Phenotype Relations for the Atypical Parkinsonism Genes: MDSGene Systematic Review

Christina Wittke, Sonja Petkovic, Valerija Dobričić, Susen Schaake, MDS‐endorsed PSP Study Group, Gesine Respondek, Anne Weißbach, Harutyun Madoev, Joanne Trinh, Eva‐Juliane Vollstedt, Neele Kuhnke, Katja Lohmann, Marija Dulovic Mahlow, Connie Marras, Inke R. König, María Stamelou, Vincenzo Bonifati, Christina M. Lill, Meike Kasten, Hans‐Jürgen Huppertz, Günter U. Höglinger, Christine Klein

2021Movement Disorders55 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

ABSTRACT This Movement Disorder Society Genetic mutation database Systematic Review focuses on monogenic atypical parkinsonism with mutations in the ATP13A2 , DCTN1 , DNAJC6 , FBXO7 , SYNJ1 , and VPS13C genes. We screened 673 citations and extracted genotypic and phenotypic data for 140 patients (73 families) from 77 publications. In an exploratory fashion, we applied an automated classification procedure via an ensemble of bootstrap‐aggregated (“bagged”) decision trees to distinguish these 6 forms of monogenic atypical parkinsonism and found a high accuracy of 86.5% (95%CI, 86.3%–86.7%) based on the following 10 clinical variables: age at onset, spasticity and pyramidal signs, hypoventilation, decreased body weight, minimyoclonus, vertical gaze palsy, autonomic symptoms, other nonmotor symptoms, levodopa response quantification, and cognitive decline. Comparing monogenic atypical with monogenic typical parkinsonism using 2063 data sets from Movement Disorder Society Genetic mutation database on patients with SNCA , LRRK2 , VPS35 , Parkin , PINK1 , and DJ‐1 mutations, the age at onset was earlier in monogenic atypical parkinsonism (24 vs 40 years; P = 1.2647 × 10 −12 ) and levodopa response less favorable than in patients with monogenic typical presentations (49% vs 93%). In addition, we compared monogenic to nonmonogenic atypical parkinsonism using data from 362 patients with progressive supranuclear gaze palsy, corticobasal degeneration, multiple system atrophy, or frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Although these conditions share many clinical features with the monogenic atypical forms, they can typically be distinguished based on their later median age at onset (64 years; IQR, 57–70 years). In conclusion, age at onset, presence of specific signs, and degree of levodopa response inform differential diagnostic considerations and genetic testing indications in atypical forms of parkinsonism. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson Movement Disorder Society.

Topics & Concepts

ParkinsonismProgressive supranuclear palsyCorticobasal degenerationLevodopaMedicineAge of onsetMovement disordersPediatricsPsychologyAtrophyPathologyParkinson's diseaseDiseaseParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological diseases and metabolismNeurological disorders and treatments
Genotype–Phenotype Relations for the Atypical Parkinsonism Genes: MDSGene Systematic Review | Litcius