Litcius/Paper detail

The importance of open science for biological assessment of aquatic environments

Marcus W. Beck, Casey C. O’Hara, Julia Stewart Lowndes, Raphael D. Mazor, Susanna Theroux, David J. Gillett, Belize Lane, Gregory Gearheart

2020PeerJ39 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Open science principles that seek to improve science can effectively bridge the gap between researchers and environmental managers. However, widespread adoption has yet to gain traction for the development and application of bioassessment products. At the core of this philosophy is the concept that research should be reproducible and transparent, in addition to having long-term value through effective data preservation and sharing. In this article, we review core open science concepts that have recently been adopted in the ecological sciences and emphasize how adoption can benefit the field of bioassessment for both prescriptive condition assessments and proactive applications that inform environmental management. An example from the state of California demonstrates effective adoption of open science principles through data stewardship, reproducible research, and engagement of stakeholders with multimedia applications. We also discuss technical, sociocultural, and institutional challenges for adopting open science, including practical approaches for overcoming these hurdles in bioassessment applications.

Topics & Concepts

Open scienceStewardship (theology)Bridge (graph theory)Computer scienceData sharingEngineering ethicsKnowledge managementManagement scienceData sciencePolitical scienceEngineeringMedicinePathologyAstronomyLawInternal medicinePhysicsPoliticsAlternative medicineResearch Data Management PracticesEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity StudiesSpecies Distribution and Climate Change