Design, synthesis, molecular docking and biological evaluation of new carbazole derivatives as anticancer, and antioxidant agents
İrfan Çapan, Mohammed Hawash, Nidal Jaradat, Yusuf Sert, Refik Servi, İrfan Koca
Abstract
Abstract Background The carbazole skeleton is an important structural motif occurring naturally or synthesized chemically and has antihistaminic, antioxidant, antitumor, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activities. Objectives This study aimed to design and synthesize a novel series of carbazole derivatives and evaluate their antiproliferative and antioxidant activities. Methods The synthesized compounds were characterized utilizing HRMS, 1 H-, and 13 C APT -NMR, and assessed for their anticancer, antifibrotic, and antioxidant effects utilizing reference biomedical procedures. In addition, the AutoDock Vina application was used to perform in-silico docking computations. Results A series of carbazole derivatives were synthesized and characterized in the current study. Compounds 10 and 11 were found to have a stronger antiproliferative effect than compounds 2 – 5 against HepG2, HeLa, and MCF7 cancer cell lines with IC 50 values of 7.68, 10.09, and 6.44 µM, respectively. Moreover, compound 9 showed potent antiproliferative activity against HeLa cancer cell lines with an IC 50 value of 7.59 µM. However, except for compound 5 , all of the synthesized compounds showed moderate antiproliferative activities against CaCo-2 with IC 50 values in the range of 43.7–187.23 µM. All of these values were compared with the positive control anticancer drug 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU). In addition, compound 9 showed the most potent anti-fibrotic compound, and the cellular viability of LX-2 was found 57.96% at 1 µM concentration in comparison with the positive control 5-FU. Moreover, 4 and 9 compounds showed potent antioxidant activities with IC 50 values of 1.05 ± 0.77 and 5.15 ± 1.01 µM, respectively. Conclusion Most of the synthesized carbazole derivatives showed promising antiproliferative, antioxidant, and antifibrotic biological effects, and further in-vivo investigations are needed to approve or disapprove these results.