Litcius/Paper detail

What Do Measures of Self-Report Interoception Measure? Insights from A Systematic Review, Latent Factor Analysis, and Network Approach

Olivier Desmedt, Alexandre Heeren, Olivier Corneille, Olivier Luminet

202125 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Recent conceptualizations of interoception suggest several facets to this construct, including "interoceptive sensibility” and “self-report interoceptive scales", both of which are assessed with questionnaires. Although these conceptual efforts have helped move the field forward, uncertainty remains regarding whether current measures converge on their measurement of a common construct. To address this question, we first identified -via a systematic review- the most cited questionnaires of interoceptive sensibility. Then, we examined their correlations, their overall factorial structure, and their network structure in a large community sample (n = 1003). The results indicate that these questionnaires tap onto distinct constructs, with low overall convergence and interrelationships between questionnaire items. This observation mitigates the interpretation and replicability of findings in self-report interoception research. We call for a better match between constructs and measures.

Topics & Concepts

InteroceptionConstruct (python library)PsychologySensibilityConstruct validitySample (material)Cognitive psychologySocial psychologyPsychometricsDevelopmental psychologyComputer sciencePerceptionLiteratureArtChemistryProgramming languageChromatographyNeurosciencePsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
What Do Measures of Self-Report Interoception Measure? Insights from A Systematic Review, Latent Factor Analysis, and Network Approach | Litcius