Litcius/Paper detail

Cotton and Surgical Masks—What Ecological Factors Are Relevant for Their Sustainability?

Mélanie Schmutz, Roland Hischier, Till Batt, Peter Wick, Bernd Nowack, Patrick Wäger, Claudia Som

2020Sustainability48 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic, wearing facemasks became common. Many initiatives arose to develop new types of reusable textile masks in order to overcome a shortage of surgical masks for the health care personnel and for the civil society. Having such high demand of facemasks raises the question about what factors define their environmental sustainability. This paper presents a first simplified Life-Cycle-Assessment (LCA) comparing surgical masks and 2-layered cotton masks. The aim of the paper is to identify and understand the relevant ecological factors in order to support decision making on how textile masks could be designed in a more sustainable manner. The results of our simplified LCA show that the cotton masks were performing better than the surgical masks and vice versa depending on the environmental impact that was looked at. It was also found that the lifespan and the weight of the cotton masks are two variables having a great importance for their overall environmental performance.

Topics & Concepts

SustainabilityEconomic shortageTextileCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Order (exchange)BusinessOperations managementRisk analysis (engineering)Environmental planningEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental resource managementMedicineEngineeringEnvironmental scienceEcologyGeographyEconomicsBiologyDiseasePathologyFinanceInfectious disease (medical specialty)LinguisticsGovernment (linguistics)PhilosophyArchaeologyInfection Control and VentilationClimate Change and Health ImpactsBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Cotton and Surgical Masks—What Ecological Factors Are Relevant for Their Sustainability? | Litcius