Litcius/Paper detail

Pre-hospital care & interfacility transport of 385 COVID-19 emergency patients: an air ambulance perspective

Peter Hilbert-Carius, Jörg Braun, Fikri M. Abu‐Zidan, Jörn Adler, Jürgen Knapp, Didier Dandrifosse, Désirée Braun, Urs Pietsch, Patrick Adamczuk, Leif Rognås, Roland Albrecht

2020Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine43 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COVID-19, the pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, is challenging healthcare systems worldwide. Little is known about problems faced by emergency medical services-particularly helicopter services-caring for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients. We aimed to describe the issues faced by air ambulance services in Europe as they transport potential COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Nine different HEMS providers in seven different countries across Europe were invited to share their experiences and to report their data regarding the care, transport, and safety measures in suspected or confirmed COVID-19 missions. Six air ambulance providers in six countries agreed and reported their data regarding development of special procedures and safety instructions in preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic. Four providers agreed to provide mission related data. Three hundred eighty-five COVID-19-related missions were analysed, including 119 primary transport missions and 266 interfacility transport missions. RESULTS: All providers had developed special procedures and safety instructions in preparation for COVID-19. Ground transport was the preferred mode of transport in primary missions, whereas air transport was preferred for interfacility transport. In some countries the transport of COVID-19 patients by regular air ambulance services was avoided. Patients in interfacility transport missions had a significantly higher median (range) NACA Score 4 (2-5) compared with 3 (1-7), needed significantly more medical interventions, were significantly younger (59.6 ± 16 vs 65 ± 21 years), and were significantly more often male (73% vs 60.5%). CONCLUSIONS: All participating air ambulance providers were prepared for COVID-19. Safe care and transport of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients is achievable. Most patients on primary missions were transported by ground. These patients were less sick than interfacility transport patients, for whom air transport was the preferred method.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Emergency medicine2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedical emergencyEmergency medical servicesSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Emergency departmentIntensive care medicineInternal medicineVirologyNursingOutbreakInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesDisaster Response and ManagementCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts