Comparative accuracy of <scp>cone‐beam CT</scp> and conventional multislice computed tomography for real‐time navigation in zygomatic implant surgery
Baoxin Tao, Yihan Shen, Yuanyuan Sun, Wei Huang, Feng Wang, Yiqun Wu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and conventional multislice CT (MSCT) are both used in zygomatic implant navigation surgery but the superiority of one technique versus the other remains unclear. PURPOSE: This study compared the accuracy of CBCT and MSCT in zygomatic implant navigation surgery by calculating the deviations of implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with severely atrophic maxillae were classified into two groups according to the use of CBCT- or MSCT-guided navigation system. The entry and apical distance deviation, and the angle deviation of zygomatic implants were measured on fused operation images. A linear effect model was used for analysis, with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 72 zygomatic implants were inserted as planned in 23 patients. The comparison of deviations in CBCT and MSCT groups showed a mean (± SD) entry deviation of 1.69 ± 0.59 mm vs 2.04 ± 0.78 mm (P = .146), apical deviation of 2 ± 0.68 mm vs 2.55 ± 0.85 (P < .001), and angle deviation of 2.32 ± 1.02° vs 3.23 ± 1.21° (P = .038). CONCLUSION: Real-time zygomatic implant navigation surgery with CBCT may result in higher values for accuracy than MSCT.