On the importance of interpretable machine learning predictions to inform clinical decision making in oncology
Sheng-Chieh Lu, Christine L. Swisher, Caroline Chung, David A. Jaffray, Chris Sidey‐Gibbons
Abstract
Machine learning-based tools are capable of guiding individualized clinical management and decision-making by providing predictions of a patient's future health state. Through their ability to model complex nonlinear relationships, ML algorithms can often outperform traditional statistical prediction approaches, but the use of nonlinear functions can mean that ML techniques may also be less interpretable than traditional statistical methodologies. While there are benefits of intrinsic interpretability, many model-agnostic approaches now exist and can provide insight into the way in which ML systems make decisions. In this paper, we describe how different algorithms can be interpreted and introduce some techniques for interpreting complex nonlinear algorithms.