Litcius/Paper detail

Platelet-rich plasma as a therapy for androgenic alopecia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adam G. Evans, James Mwangi, Rand W. Pope, Mirjana G. Ivanic, Mina A. Botros, Gabriella E. Glassman, F. Bennett Pearce, Salam Kassis

2020Journal of Dermatological Treatment51 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The past decade has seen platelet-rich plasma (PRP) become a popular therapy around the world as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia (AGA). These systematic review and meta-analyses assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of PRP to determine the role of PRP as a treatment for AGA among the other non-surgical treatment modalities. METHODS: This study follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and is registered under the PROSPERO ID CRD42019136329. Seven databases were searched from inception through May 2019. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to evaluate the effect of PRP treatments on hair density and hair thickness. RESULTS: Thirty studies, including 687 patients, met our inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine studies reported beneficial results, and 24 studies reached statistical significance on a measured outcome. Ten RCTs were included. Our meta-analyses show that PRP treatment increases hair density and hair thickness. CONCLUSIONS: PRP is an autologous treatment that lacks serious adverse effects and effectively improves hair density and hair thickness in men and women with AGA. Future research should include low risk-of-bias RCTs to optimize treatment protocols, investigate variability among studies, and to obtain more data on hair thickness changes.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineMeta-analysisAdverse effectPlatelet-rich plasmaRandomized controlled trialHair lossSystematic reviewMEDLINEDermatologyInternal medicinePublication biasPlateletPolitical scienceLawHair Growth and DisordersFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery TechniquesDermatologic Treatments and Research