Litcius/Paper detail

Impact of clinical presentation on bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention and implications for the ARC-HBR definition.

Felice Gragnano, Alessandro Spirito, Noé Corpataux, Lukas Vaisnora, Roberto Galea, Giuseppe Gargiulo, George C.M. Siontis, Fabien Praz, Jonas Lanz, Michael Billinger, Lukas Hunziker, Stefan Stortecky, Thomas Pilgrim, Sarah Bär, Yasushi Ueki, Davide Capodanno, Philip Urban, Stuart Pocock, Roxana Mehran, Dik Heg, Stephan Windecker, Lorenz Räber, Marco Valgimigli

2021Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern)36 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND The identification of bleeding risk factors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is essential to inform subsequent management. Whether clinical presentation per se affects bleeding risk after PCI remains unclear. AIMS We aimed to assess whether clinical presentation per se predisposes to bleeding in patients undergoing PCI and if the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) High Bleeding Risk (HBR) criteria perform consistently in acute (ACS) and chronic (CCS) coronary syndrome patients. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing PCI from the Bern PCI Registry were stratified by clinical presentation. Bleeding events at one year were compared in ACS versus CCS patients, and the originally defined ARC-HBR criteria were assessed. RESULTS Among 16,821 patients, 9,503 (56.5%) presented with ACS. At one year, BARC 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 4.97% and 3.60% of patients with ACS and CCS, respectively. After adjustment, ACS remained associated with higher BARC 3 or 5 bleeding risk (adjusted HR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.43; p=0.034), owing to non-access site-related occurrences, which accrued mainly within the first 30 days after PCI. The ARC-HBR score had lower discrimination among ACS compared with CCS patients, and its performance slightly improved when ACS was computed as a minor criterion. CONCLUSIONS ACS presentation per se predicts one-year major bleeding risk after PCI. The ARC-HBR score discrimination appeared lower in ACS than CCS, and its overall performance improved numerically when ACS was computed as an additional minor risk criterion.

Topics & Concepts

MedicineConventional PCIPercutaneous coronary interventionAcute coronary syndromeInternal medicineInterventional cardiologyPresentation (obstetrics)CardiologySurgeryMyocardial infarctionAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Impact of clinical presentation on bleeding risk after percutaneous coronary intervention and implications for the ARC-HBR definition. | Litcius