Effect of Electrolyte Composition and Concentration on Pulsed Potential Electrochemical CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction
Rileigh Casebolt, Kevin W. Kimura, Kelsey Levine, Jessica Akemi Cimada DaSilva, Ji-Yoon Kim, Tyler A. Dunbar, Jin Suntivich, Tobias Hanrath
Abstract
Abstract With rising CO 2 emissions and growing interests towards CO 2 valorization, electrochemical CO 2 reduction (eCO 2 R) has emerged as a promising prospect for carbon recycling and chemical energy storage. Yet, product selectivity and electrocatalyst longevity persist as obstacles to the broad implementation of eCO 2 R. A possible solution to ameliorate this challenge is to pulse the applied potential. However, it is currently unclear whether and how the trends and lessons obtained from the more conventional constant potential eCO 2 R translate to pulsed potential eCO 2 R. In this work, we report that the relationship between electrolyte concentration/composition and product distribution for pulsed potential eCO 2 R is different from constant potential eCO 2 R. In the case of constant potential eCO 2 R, increasing KHCO 3 concentration favors the formation of H 2 and CH 4 . In contrast, for pulsed potential eCO 2 R, H 2 formation is suppressed due to the periodic desorption of surface protons, while CH 4 is still favored. In the case of KCl, increasing the concentration during constant potential eCO 2 R does not affect product distribution, mainly producing H 2 and CO. However, increasing KCl concentration during pulsed potential eCO 2 R persistently suppresses H 2 formation and greatly favors C 2 products, reaching 71 % Faradaic efficiency. Collectively, these results provide new mechanistic insights into the pulsed eCO 2 R mechanism within the context of proton‐donator ability and ionic conductivity.