Litcius/Paper detail

Risk compensation and face mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic

Youpei Yan, Jude Bayham, Aaron Richter, Eli P. Fenichel

2021Scientific Reports102 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Face masks are an important component in controlling COVID-19, and policy orders to wear masks are common. However, behavioral responses are seldom additive, and exchanging one protective behavior for another could undermine the COVID-19 policy response. We use SafeGraph smart device location data and variation in the date that US states and counties issued face mask mandates as a set of natural experiments to investigate risk compensation behavior. We compare time at home and the number of visits to public locations before and after face mask orders conditional on multiple statistical controls. We find that face mask orders lead to risk compensation behavior. Americans subject to the mask orders spend 11-24 fewer minutes at home on average and increase visits to some commercial locations-most notably restaurants, which are a high-risk location. It is unclear if this would lead to a net increase or decrease in transmission. However, it is clear that mask orders would be an important part of an economic recovery if people otherwise overestimate the risk of visiting public places.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Pandemic2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Face (sociological concept)BetacoronavirusFace masksVirologyCompensation (psychology)Computer scienceMedicinePsychologyOutbreakInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)SociologyPsychoanalysisDiseaseSocial scienceInfection Control and VentilationCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Risk compensation and face mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic | Litcius