Litcius/Paper detail

Place crowd safety, crowd science? Case studies and application

Keith Still, Marina Papalexi, Yiyi Fan, David Bamford

2020Journal of Place Management and Development39 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the development and application of place crowd safety management tools for areas of public assembly and major events, from a practitioner perspective. Design/methodology/approach The crowd safety risk assessment model is known as design, information, management-ingress, circulation, egress (DIM-ICE) (Still, 2009) is implemented to optimise crowd safety and potentially throughput. Three contrasting case studies represent examples of some of the world’s largest and most challenging crowd safety projects. Findings The paper provides some insight into how the DIM-ICE model can be used to aid strategic planning at major events, assess potential crowd risks and to avoid potential crowd safety issues. Practical implications It provides further clarity to what effective place management practice is. Evidence-based on the case studies demonstrates that the application of the DIM-ICE model is useful for recognising potential place crowd safety issues and identifying areas for require improvement. Originality/value Crowd science is an emerging field of research, which is primarily motivated by place crowd safety issues in congested places; the application and reporting of an evidence-based model (i.e. DIM-ICE model) add to this. The paper addresses a research gap related to the implementation of analytic tools in characterising place crowd dynamics.

Topics & Concepts

OriginalityCLARITYComputer sciencePerspective (graphical)Risk analysis (engineering)Data scienceKnowledge managementManagement scienceBusinessEngineeringCreativityPolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceChemistryLawBiochemistryEvacuation and Crowd DynamicsTraffic and Road SafetyDisaster Management and Resilience