Litcius/Paper detail

Nintedanib in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Marya Ghazipura, Manoj J. Mammen, Derrick D. Herman, Stephanie M. Hon, Brittany D. Bissell, Madalina Macrea, Fayez Kheir, Yet H. Khor, Shandra L. Knight, Ganesh Raghu, Kevin C. Wilson, Tanzib Hossain

2022Annals of the American Thoracic Society60 citationsDOI

Abstract

Abstract Background The American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax convened to update clinical practice guidelines for interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objective To conduct a systematic review to evaluate existing ILD literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic nintedanib. Data Sources A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using nintedanib to treat patients with PPF. Data Extraction Mortality, disease progression, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis Two relevant studies were selected. The annual decline in forced vital capacity was less in the nintedanib arm in the overall study population (mean difference [MD], 107 ml/yr; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4 to 148.5 ml/yr) and in the subgroups with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of pulmonary fibrosis (MD, 128.2 ml/yr; 95% CI, 70.8 to 185.6 ml/yr), non-UIP patterns of pulmonary fibrosis (MD, 75.3 ml/yr; 95% CI, 15.5 to 135.0 ml/yr), fibrotic connective tissue disease-related ILD (MD, 106.2 ml/yr; 95% CI, 10.6 to 201.9 ml/yr), fibrotic idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (MD, 141.7 ml/yr; 95% CI, 46.0 to 237.4 ml/yr), and fibrotic occupational ILD (MD, 252.8 ml/yr; 95% CI, 79.2 to 426.5 ml/yr), but not fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (MD, 72.9 ml/yr; 95% CI, −8.9 to 154.7 ml/yr), fibrotic sarcoidosis (MD, −20.5 ml/yr; 95% CI, −337.1 to 296.1 ml/yr), or unclassified fibrotic ILD (MD, 68.5 ml/yr; 95% CI, −31.3 to 168.4 ml/yr) when compared with placebo. Gastrointestinal side effects were common. Quality of evidence for the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate GRADE. Conclusions Nintedanib use in patients with PPF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in disease progression but increase in gastrointestinal side effects regardless of the radiographic pattern of pulmonary fibrosis. However, limitations in the available evidence lead to low certainty in these effect estimates and make definitive conclusions about the differential effects by subtype of ILD difficult to determine. Primary Source of Funding Funded by the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax.

Topics & Concepts

NintedanibMedicineIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisHypersensitivity pneumonitisInterstitial lung diseaseUsual interstitial pneumoniaPulmonary fibrosisInternal medicineAdverse effectVital capacityCryptogenic Organizing PneumoniaIdiopathic interstitial pneumoniaPopulationPneumoniaIntensive care medicineLungPulmonologistsConnective tissue diseaseFibrosisPulmonary rehabilitationPneumonitisSarcoidosisPathologyRespiratory diseaseRespiratory failurePulmonary function testingPirfenidoneAspiration pneumoniaDLCORespiratory systemInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Nintedanib in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | Litcius