Litcius/Paper detail

Utility of Stool PCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Comparison of Two Commercial Platforms

Wendy Szymczak, D. Goldstein, Erika P. Orner, Roger Fecher, Raquel T. Yokoda, Karin A. Skalina, Momka Narlieva, Inessa Gendlina, Amy S. Fox

2020Journal of Clinical Microbiology33 citationsDOIOpen Access PDF

Abstract

) values of >37 for the targets detected. Of the 48 patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19, 23 were positive by both assays (47.9%). For the negative patient group, 2/29 were positive by both assays (6.9%). The two stool PCR-positive, nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal PCR-negative patients were SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive. Our results demonstrate acceptable agreement between two commercially available molecular assays and support the use of stool PCR to confirm diagnosis when SARS-CoV-2 is undetectable in the upper respiratory tract.

Topics & Concepts

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakVirologyMedicineBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPneumoniaMicrobiologyBiologyInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)OutbreakDiseaseSARS-CoV-2 detection and testingSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Utility of Stool PCR for the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Comparison of Two Commercial Platforms | Litcius