Dietary supplementation of rumen native microbes improves lactation performance and feed efficiency in dairy cows
M. Nehme Marinho, M.C. Perdomo, B Souza Simões, Ali Husnain, U. Arshad, C.C. Figueiredo, J.E.P. Santos
Abstract
Objectives were to determine the effects of 2 dietary microbial additives supplemented to diets of Holstein cows on productive performance and feed efficiency. One-hundred and 17 Holstein cows were enrolled at 61 d (31 to 87 d) postpartum in a randomized complete block design experiment. Cows were blocked by parity group, as nulliparous or multiparous cows and, within parity, by pre-treatment energy-corrected milk yield. Within block, cows were randomly assigned to one of 3 treatments administered as top-dress for 140 d. Treatments consisted of either 100 g of corn meal containing no microbial additive (CON; 15 primiparous and 25 multiparous), 100 g of corn meal containing 5 g of a mixture of Clostridium beijerinckii and Pichia kudriavzevii (G1; 4 × 10 7 cfu of C. beijerinckii and 1 × 10 9 cfu of P. kudriavzevii ; 14 primiparous and 24 multiparous), or 100 g of corn meal containing 5 g of a mixture of C. beijerinckii , P. kudriavzevii , Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens , and Ruminococcus bovis (G2; 4 × 10 7 cfu of C. beijerinckii, 1 × 10 9 cfu of P. kudriavzevii, 1 × 10 8 cfu of B. fibrisolvens , and 1 × 10 8 cfu of R. bovis ; 15 primiparous and 24 multiparous). Intake of DM, milk yield, and BW were measured daily, whereas milk composition was analyzed at each milking 2 d a week, and body condition was scored twice weekly. Milk samples were collected on d 60 and 62 in the experiment and analyzed for individual fatty acids. The data were analyzed with mixed-effects models with orthogonal contrast to determine the impact of microbial additive (MA; CON vs. 1/2 G1 + 1/2 G2) and type of microbial additive (TMA; G1 vs. G2). Results are described in sequence as CON, G1, and G2. Intake of DM (22.2 vs. 22.4 vs. 22.4 kg/d), BW (685 vs. 685 vs. 685 kg) and the daily BW change (0.40 vs. 0.39 vs. 0.39 kg/d) did not differ among treatments; however, feeding MA tended to increase BCS (3.28 vs. 3.33 vs. 3.36). Supplementing MA increased yields of milk (39.9 vs. 41.3 vs. 41.5 kg/d), ECM (37.9 vs. 39.3 vs. 39.9 kg/d), fat (1.31 vs. 1.37 vs. 1.40 kg/d), total solids (4.59 vs. 4.75 vs. 4.79 kg/d), and ECM per kg of DMI (1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.80 kg/kg). Furthermore, cows fed MA increased yields of pre-formed fatty acids in milk fat (>16C; 435 vs. 463 vs. 488 g/d), particularly unsaturated fatty acids (367 vs. 387 vs. 410 g/d), such as linoleic (C18:2 cis -9, cis -12; 30.9 vs. 33.5 vs. 35.4 g/d) and α-linolenic acids (C18:3 cis -9, cis -12, cis -15; 2.46 vs. 2.68 vs. 2.82 g/d) on d 60 and 62 in the experiment. Collectively, supplementing G1 and G2 improved productive performance of cows with no differences between the 2 MA.